Why I Love Writing Historical Fiction

I do enjoy writing about the law, editors, agents, self publishing, etc., etc., etc. What my heart wants is what it wants, and I love history. I crave knowledge about the past because in knowing and understanding the past, we will create a better future,at least theoretically. As one of my mentors told me, “pick a time in history, live it, write it.” Those were the only words I needed to hear to craft my first work of historical fiction, a two-book series, “Reign of the Holy King/Reign of the Oak King” set during the Wars of the Roses (a historical misnomer by the way – the term was not contemporary to the time).

I’m not going to give away the plot but leave it to say, it opens doors that I found long buried in the historical record.  I grew up going to the Donnell Library in NYC to listen to medieval instrumental music, the madrigals of Spain, and the songs composed by Henry VIII. I laughed my head off about the instrument called a sackbut (a form of trombone) and still do. In Chicago’s Art Institute, I perused real medieval manuscript illuminations, studying the intricate detail and painstaking care it took to produce even one page on vellum (sheepskin) for my final paper in AP European History. I always disputed the theory that the dark ages were dark in intellect and achievement. They were far from it.

The more I learned, the more I wanted to know. Every year it seemed, something was being revealed, discovered, dug up, or brought to light that made my chosen field of study (Renaissance/medieval history) closer to accessible in the modern age. DNA testing, forensic archaeology, architectural scans…none of these existed when I was a kid. The only reality for me was found in Chaucer, Chretien de Troyes, pages of “The Once and Future King”, and every variation of the Arthurian legend I could get my hands on. Throw in Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit (grounded in Norse sagas) and I was set.

I think when we look at how people lived hundreds or even thousands of years ago, it gives us perspective on two facts: (1) excluding technological advances, we really haven’t changed all that much, and (2) we’re still interested in the same types of things although they take a different form in 2015 than in, say, 1415.

I often wonder what I would do if I had to hunt for my food; lacked motorized transportation; and make my own clothes. Think about it: make your own clothes? Hunting I can handle, travel by foot or horse, check, but making my own togs (love that word), ouch. And with no sewing machine no less. Clothing, therefore, would have a very high value the more refined the fabric used to make it with, right? That is part of the reason why nobility dressed so fine compared to, say, a local farmer in France. That’s also why it would be bizarre to assert they were filthy people. Sure, bathing was not popular with the Puritans, but the nobility most definitely bathed and often. Edward III of England put hot and cold water taps in Westminster Palace in 1351 to fill his tub (personal bathtubs were rare).

We all see parodies of Renaissance feasts where turkey legs are hucked all over creation. Not so. Because the clothing was so expensive, the nobility took care to keep it clean. Pages with ewers would pour scented water over guests’ hands between plates or courses so they would be clean.

A good piece of historical fiction can bring the time period to life and lend insight into how people lived, loved, and fought. We can read these books and see ourselves reflected in the characters. I think some things would have grated a bit, for example, the fact that women were considered property during the Renaissance. Dower and curtesy is what you paid (a bride price) to marry into a good family. That system was finally abolished during the early 20th century.  Surprised? I wasn’t. Women nonetheless ran households, commanded armies, and had real power in their own right. That was cool.

Some recent series and films offer a glimpse into the late Medieval/pre-Tudor world. The Vikings series is beyond awesome. When you see people dressed differently and definitely not speaking the English they would have in The White Queen, their reality comes crashing into our own in a very pleasant way.  We watch them and think how much we the same yet different. I love that.

I’m working on several historical pieces now set in various countries and spanning almost a thousand years between the three. I devour archaeological news scanning for something wonderful and exciting that has come to light. I know there are many of you out there who share that passion for the time when nights were dark, roads not traveled, and the only light was golden and emanated from a taper or torch. The time when the world was a quiet place and magic was as real as peoples’ connection to the land and earth that has long been lost. Is it a place lost to memory or the renewed act of remembering? I prefer the latter. I would love to read what your favorite period in history is. Oh, a note about the clip below: Edward IV did die suddenly. Many suspect he had untreated type 2 diabetes which really wreaked havoc on him as he grew content and became quite the glutton.

Posted in character development, Historical Fiction, Writing | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Breathing Life Into Your Lawyer Character

I will be the first to admit that I loved the Perry Mason books and t.v. show when I was a kid. I also enjoyed reading the ripping yarns of Scott Turow (“One L” sent shivers down my non-Socratic-method spine) and, of course, John Grisham. Matlock was kind of corny but I watched it every now and again. Coming of age in the 1980s, L.A. Law was the “it” lawyer show to watch, although “The Paper Chase” was much better and more accurate.

Most lawyers are characters, believe me. I know from my own personal experience that they get themselves into some crazy messes. Right now, “Better Call Saul” is my number one favorite portrayal of the average lawyer I know. That and the dialogue is brilliant.

But if you’re crafting, say, a trial scene, the reality of those moments is much more mundane that what you read or see on video media. Here’s a good piece of actual dialogue from one of my first trials:

Judge: “Mr. Canberra, where is your client?”

Canberra (flipping through his file and dropping his pen onto counsel table with a thud): “I don’t know your honor, it says here he’s a decedent.”

Me: chortle chortle

Judge: “Excuse me, did you just say he was a decedent?”

Me (under my breath): “He’s dead? Guess he won’t be showing up.” more chortling

Canberra: (stuttering): “Y,Yes, your honor, a decedent.

Judge: “Now Mr. Canberra, don’t you think that I would be the first to know whether or not the man was a decedent?”

Court clerk, bailiff, and court reporter start laughing but try to hide it.

Canberra (turning a shade of crimson I’d never seen before and flipping hard through the pages. He stops and pokes his finger at an entry): “Of course, your Honor. Absolutely you would. But you see he’s not a decedent, he’s a merchant semen.”

The entire court erupts in loud laughter, including myself.

Judge: “Mr. Canberra, you’re telling the court he is a sea MAN, a seaman?”

Canberra (smiling and placing file onto counsel table): “Yes, your honor, he is. And I need a new court date if you don’t mind. He is, as I just discovered, out at sea.”

Canberra sits and neither myself nor the judge can contain our laughter any longer. The moment passes and his client got the new court date.

Occasionally, the average attorney will get a really great case and it will make the news. But most authors won’t exactly hunt these stories down; and the transcripts will generally be procedural and dry. Obviously if you write about true crime, it’s less about the lawyers and more about the victim, the perp, and the investigators who out the bad guy (hopefully) for the sake of justice.

What provides better fodder for lawyer focused novels is the darker side of the profession: engaging in money laundering for a prostitution ring (true story); getting into bed with the mob for money; rigging cases with the judge; hiding evidence or destroying it (in massive quantities sometimes, as the Cobell v. Norton Indian Trust Settlement case);  and yes, committing crimes themselves.

I would urge you to give a cursory glance at a transcript or two to get a feel for the language spoken by lawyers in the courtroom. Watch those dry video feeds of courtroom proceedings. Understand what each player in the courtroom does. It is different from what most people consider “normal” behavior. Remember, it is grounded in medieval British and Germanic concepts and practices of meting out justice. The language (known as “legalese”) can be downright unintelligible – res ipsa loquitur – “let the thing speak for itself.” I still get a kick out of people who want to “squash” their warrants, not “quash” them, which is the proper word. I suppose if you sat on one it would be deemed squashed.

Witnesses rarely, if ever, freak out, too. Occasionally some poor, unbalanced soul will lose it on the stand, particularly in divorce and probate cases. Most judges kibosh that noise pretty quickly. If the person doesn’t stop the ruckus, they’re carted off to the pokey. That would be a good opportunity to throw in some choice words for the instigator that reveals some darker subplot.

Corporate lawyers are famous for being shady. This proved to be mostly true during the tobacco litigation cases; any toxic tort case such as Love Canal in New York or the Karen Silkwood matter; the entire Wall Street meltdown and fall of Goldman-Sachs and other huge brokerage houses; and anything to do with oil, gas, uranium, or diamonds. Much of what these entities do that is hidden from public view can prove horrifying and become the basis for an excellent good vs. evil plot. Mr. Grisham has perfected that technique.

Today, you could use the terrifying accessibility law enforcement and other government agencies have to the ordinary person and use a lawyer character as a foil. Edward Snowden’s case proves my point in that regard. So does the proliferation of cameras and other digital recording devices that can literally track your every move in any given city in the United States. That’s our current dystopian reality.

Much of the courtroom drama you see in the video age is just that: drama. Much of it actually rolls like “My Cousin Vinny” (my all time favorite lawyer movie). If you can craft a character who represents a happy medium of astuteness and humility combined with humor, I guarantee you will connect with the average reader. I don’t think that most people favor reading about lawyers when the lawyer doesn’t “get it” in the end unless that lawyer is neither stuck up nor unethical.

Oh and “Legally Blonde” is another fave. Ironically, this scene is not as far removed from the truth as you might imagine. But that’s for you to figure out as you create your next stellar legal mind to either save the day or single-handedly cause the decline of Western civilization as we know it.

 

Posted in character development, law, lawyers, Writing | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment